what the bleep do we know debunkedgoblin commander units
Photos View All Photos Movie Info Amanda, a divorced photographer, has a fantastic experience when life begins to unravel around her, revealing the cellular,. Cast. [11], Scientists who have reviewed What the Bleep Do We Know!? I think its a good idea for people to consider the example of Hagelin: hes completely delusional and has zero common sense, but able to function at a high level in the particle theory community. (I haven't). Featuring interviews with scientists and theologians, this compelling film thrusts the viewer into a world where science and spirituality intersect. But when you hear about quantum mechanics and consciousness, you should assume the author is a crackpot unless proven otherwise. Not exactly, Amit. Supported by groups like the Templeton Foundation, legitimateor more creative scientists are exploring the mind-body connection, or the similarities between particle-and-wave physics and certain religious concepts like the Trinity. ), is hooked on prescription pills, and mopes about while her chirpy roommate spatters paint around their apartment. A: Of course it does. But when you get hit with so much information that's been edited to within a frame of its life, things get a bit confusing. One should take seriously the danger that hes not the only one deluding himself. The weirdness of quantum mechanics is reserved for either very specially prepared configurations in the laboratory, or scales that are so small that quantum-mechanical effects are significant. Columbus certainly didn't speak the language, and the locals didn't keep written records. Even followers of spiritual traditions that believe in worldly illusion will have problems with "Bleep." We're also connected to the universe by gravity, and we're connected to the planets by gravity. What could be worse than being aware of every tiny detail that your brain handles from phosphate levels to heart rate and hair growth. People tend to believe that the fact that a certain kind of research is pursued by sizable numbers of people with very good credentials is enough to mean it must be good research. Even skeptics concede that we humans can fall into destructive thought patterns and need to cleanse our vision of what's real. Do We Know!? 34 talking about this. Often, people who are trying to sell whatever it is they're trying to sell try to justify it on the basis of science. Right now they use a key that's based on the products of large prime numbers, and no computer could determine the prime factors in a time shorter than the age of the universe. Isnt that a bit like attacking algebra because of Serge Langs nutty ideas about HIV and AIDS? The observer can't be ignored." The question "What the bleep do we know?" has an unambiguous answer: both surprisingly much and amazingly little. I'm always up for a good New Age flick, even one masquerading as a documentary. Use this form to email 'What the bleep are they on about?' It was amusing when John Hagelin tried to run for US president representing the Natural Law party during the 1990s. Heisenberg basically says you can't get a really accurate fix on both the position and the momentum of a subatomic particle say an electron at the same time. You can renew your subscription or Within several weeks, the film had appeared in a dozen or more theaters (mostly in the western United States), and within six months it had made its way into 200 theaters across the US. (It's all to do with photons of light from your measuring instrument hitting the poor electron and knocking it for six). All those things can be attributed to quantum mechanics first of all, because it's so poorly understood by the public, and especially because it's so verifiably weird. Particles embracing all possible states until they are forced by an experiment to assume one state, one particle being in two adjacent places simultaneously, the inability to precisely measure a particle's position and momentum at the same time - these are just a few of the weird manifestations of quantum physics. [14] Amongst the assertions in the film that have been challenged are that water molecules can be influenced by thought (as popularized by Masaru Emoto), that meditation can reduce violent crime rates of a city,[15] and that quantum physics implies that "consciousness is the ground of all being." But quantum-mechanical computers might be able to, and then of course we'd have to start thinking about how to make things more secure. Once they do bump into each other they form their regular little selves. Hagelin was a grad student at Harvard when I was an undergrad and I met him when we were in the same quantum field theory class. Is this a hoax to promote positivity? Publishers Weekly What the Bleep Do We Know!? But quantum mechanics rules out the possibility of hidden variables. His list of "worst abusers" includes inspirational author Deepak Chopra, the best-selling book "The Secret" and the whole field of Transcendental Meditation. Get ABC Sciences weekly newsletter Science Updates, The 'underground astronaut' in search of ancient bones, Voyager probes still signalling from the edge of the Solar System, Solar eclipses: Everything you need to know, Five ways your smartphone could help save lives, Chinese scientists use satellite to smash quantum entanglement record, Einstein's light bending theory directly observed in distant stars for first time, Third gravitational wave detection puts new spin on black holes. Wow, indeed! Find many great new & used options and get the best deals for What the Bleep Do We Know? Those points suggest that quantum-derived "possibilities" affect the wider world, that human thought is the ultimate arbiter of physical reality, and that by manipulating thought properly, people can achieve harmony and even shape the structure of matter. This is one reason physicists studying a subatomic particle create large numbers of them in particle accelerators. logged you out. His 73 papers are mostly about supersymmetric GUTs and considered quite respectable, with a total of over 5000 citations, including 641 citations for one of them alone. The Effect of Meditation on Violent Crime in Washington, DC. Adapted from "Ask the Everyday Scientist" with permission of the writer. In the documentary segments of the film, interviewees discuss the roots and meaning of Amanda's experiences. (2005)", "Cult Science Dressing Up Mysticism as Quantum Physics", "The New Age Spiritualist and the Old School Scholars", https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=What_the_Bleep_Do_We_Know!%3F&oldid=1139210194, Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License 3.0, That the universe is best seen as constructed from thoughts and ideas rather than from. Even so it notched up $10m in. But this only applies to sub-atomic particles a rock doesn't need you to bump into it to exist. Our mind has enormous potential, but we only use a small part of it for conscious thought, and we miss a lot of what's going on around us so, in a leap of creatively edited logic 3. As one of the film's characters gushes early in the proceedings, 'The moment we acknowledge the quantum self, we say that somebody has become enlightened'. The host of the show said this was done because it was negative Viewers instead are fed a nauseating stream of nonsense that traces back to the teaching of a woman who claims to channel a 35,000-year-old deity. Simon Singh called it pseudoscience and said the suggestion "that if observing water changes its molecular structure, and if we are 90% water, then by observing ourselves we can change at a fundamental level via the laws of quantum physics" was "ridiculous balderdash". This message will appear once per week Everything from the possibility of disappearing and reappearing, to the possibility of having strange new forms of communication. Update: More information at the end of the video description.Comment approval now removed. Study Guide", "Teaching physics mysteries versus pseudoscience", "Review: What The Bleep Do We Know!? 19802023 The Christian Science Monitor. contact customer service Science and engineering are important for our future, and anything that engages the public can only be a good thing." The experts start "proving" that humans create their own reality by getting too attached to certain brain chemicals. I guess the difference between me and those other people is that I actually have some grasp on the concepts that the movie was trying to talk about. 1. [5] Foreign gross added another $5 million for a worldwide gross of nearly $16 million. We don't know which way it's going to go. All the weirdness of quantum mechanics gets washed out on the scale that we can experience. It's certainly not. Interspersed with Amanda's woes and the pseudoscience are random attacks on organized religion. The film has a web-site, and there is a long article in Salon explaining that the whole thing is really the production of a cult based in the Pacific Northwest that believes that a woman named JZ Knight is able to channel a 35,000 year old mystic named Ramtha. Q. So what better thing to have than something that gives you everything you want? Beyond fear, beyond anger. Therefore people get the notion that there's no objective reality, and that you can literally impact on the external world just by doing things internally. Lawrence Krauss: I think it's probably one of the most abused concepts in physics among the public. A classic experiment on visual processing involves asking people to watch a video of 6 people passing a basketball, and press a button every time a particular team has possession. If quantum physics baffled the late Dr. Feynman, one of its most brilliant explorers, then no one should feel embarrassed for failing to understand the subject. "[3] It offers alternative spirituality views characteristic of New Age philosophy, including critiques of the competing claims of stewardship among traditional religions [viz., institutional Judaism, Christianity, and Islam] of universally recognized and accepted moral values. Several books have been written about the film's remarkable grassroots marketing campaign, which led to its unprecedented success. kazakore (kazakore) January 14, 2010, 6:30pm #10 Doesn't the quantum world pervade everything that we see around us? Wertheim continues that the film "abandons itself entirely to the ecstasies of quantum mysticism, finding in this aleatory description of nature the key to spiritual transformation. Q: Some scientists, such as Sir Roger Penrose, have talked about neurons as quantum systems. And a lot of people talk about quantum consciousness that even if the everyday world we see is not a system that can be changed, our consciousness about the world can be changed. Short Range Tests of Newtons Inverse-Square Law. the film What The Bleep Do We Know It was an information that really left me speechless and I ordered his books at once techhose.d-webhost.orphans.co.uk 2 / 11. ?, with over 15 hours of material on three double-sided DVDs. There are also phrases plagiarized entire from "The Matrix," a far superior film treatment of the notion that reality isn't what it seems. One has already been recognized: If we do carefully prepare quantum systems, and keep them isolated, we can perform quantum magic technologically potentially on scales that we haven't been able to do before. Initially, the film was released in only two theaters: one in Yelm, Washington (the home of the producers, which is also the home of Ramtha), and the other the Bagdad Theater in Portland, Oregon, where it was filmed. But no scientific discovery has proved so ripe for spiritual projection as the theories of quantum physics, replete with their quixotic qualities of uncertainty, simultaneity and parallelism." It was the biggest bunch of garbage that I had ever seen. We must shake off the "ugly, superstitious, backwater concept of God" we learned as children, chides JZ Knight--uh, Ramtha. Quantum mechanics is crazy, but it's just crazy enough to make the world still be sensible at a macroscopic level, the level that we experience. Can the weirdness of quantum mechanics make you well, or make you wealthy? She's averse to churches (she married her husband in one, so they must be bad! They are relevant because of the deliberateness on the part of the film makers to keep certain facts unknown (ironically, it is I making the unknown know) and misrepresent others. based on this subject nature contained, I hold these 2 films in a very high regard. Happy Water Crystals Debunked as PseudoScience June 23rd, 2018 - Are Dr Masaru Emoto?s Fantastic Claims Actually Real Via is masaru emoto . In fact, "you are God in the making," which explains why Shirley MacLaine is a Ramtha fan. Down the Rabbit Hole - Quantum Edition multi-disc DVD set was released, containing two extended versions of What the Bleep Do We Know! A moment in which 'the mathematical formalisms of quantum mechanics [] are stripped of all empirical content and reduced to a set of syrupy nostrums'. D (k)ow!? Check out this great listen on Audible.com. ?Discovering the Endless Possibilities of Your Everyday Reality. I remember Hagelin wanting to discuss how quantum field theory could explain how TMers were able to levitate, something about how they did this by changing the position of the pole in the propagator. They were showing us the pictures of the waves converging to a point a meditation trick and this picture had a caption explaining that the unified field theory has already been found. But to insist, as one on-screen interviewee does, that the material world around us is just one "possible movement of consciousness" undermines the possibility of any objective, external reality--something fundamental to many religions and to science. That sounds like magic. Blech. Hobbs further disputed the film's use of the ten percent of the brain myth. Then comes "Carl Sagan Meets Madame Blavatsky." That's why we experience a classical world. During the resulting chat, two men carrying a wooden door passed between the stranger and the subjects. Q: Why do you think that people have seized upon this? Amanda is a photographer, who seems to be highly skilled but not very successful professionally. This movie agrees with the scientists as far as the existence of the so called empty space is concerned. Reality is happening in our brain all the time we're receiving it but it's not being integrated." Details in the video itself.EXTENDED REFERENCES:Revelation:[a] Michael Freze, 1993, Voices, Visions, and Apparitions, OSV Publishing ISBN 087973454X page 252[b] http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/faith[c] http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=confidence[d] http://www.thefreedictionary.com/faith[e] http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/faith[f] Dictionary.com. And I came out of wanting to meditate more often, which can't be a bad thing. Hagelin might be crazy, but some of those papers are co-written by John Ellis and other respectable people. You are free to comment as you wish. Andrew B Newberg, (MD, Radiologist), in What the Bleep Do We Know? Having watched this travesty of a movie, any real scientist worth his quarks might be gun-shy about joining the debate. As the movie did, this book compels listeners to ask themselves Gre. In the 1970s that abruptly stopped and moved to getting us off this planet. They were spreading their methods of meditation but that was not the main thing that impressed me. The part where the scientist put water under a microscope that was sitting under the label "I hate you" or "I want to kill you" Looked distorted and dirty but water blessed by monks was uniform and beautiful. Marlee Matlin, Barry Newman, Elaine Hendrix. A moderately low-budget independent film, it was promoted using viral marketing methods and opened in art-house theaters in the western United States, winning several independent film awards before being picked up by a major distributor and eventually grossing over $10 million. Intercut with these metaphysical ponderings is a soapy fictional narrative starring Marlee Matlin as a broken-hearted photographer. Dr Joe Dispenza and Miceal Ledwith are both long time students and appointed teachers at Ramthas school of enlightenment (RSE). . We're such a shallow people. Im not personally familiar with any of Hagelins work but Im sure theres some good physics in there. The general idea was that since quantum mechanics supposedly says that there isnt one reality, but an infinite number of possibilities, one just has to be enlightened to an awareness of this, and then you can make whatever you want happen. It presents itself as the thinking rebel's alternative to Hollywood pabulum: a heady stew of drama and documentary, starring Oscar-winning actress Marlee Matlin as a Xanax-addled photographer who. It's hard to say where Candace Pert got the low-down on what the Native American Indians did or didn't see when Columbus and the gang hit the horizon. The fact that someone who spouts such utter nonsense can get a Ph.D. from Harvard and be one of the most widely cited authors on supersymmetric models is pretty remarkable. Now I don't have an automatic prejudice against 35,000-year-old warriors from Atlantis or the women who channel them. At some point I guess he updated it to string field theory and the version you provided a link for. It is my task to convince you not to turn away because you don't understand it. One of the scientists who was in the film and had never appeared at the school is Dr David Albert Professor and Director of Philosophical Physics at Columbia university. John Haglin You might think that meant there were 18% fewer violent crimes than in the previous year, but the decrease was actually relative to his predicted increase based on some fancy statistical footwork. On this Wikipedia the language links are at the top of the page across from the article title. Both are indeed mysterious, and their genuine mystery needs none of the hype with which this film relentlessly and noisily belabours us", concluding that the film is "tosh". Quotes From the Movies Science Of The Mind Fifth Dimension Joe Dispenza Get What You Want Neurons Brain Spirituality The infinite info that the brain is processing every single second tells us there is more to the world then we're perceiving it. Featured individuals [ edit] The film features interview segments of: The Bleep in a Nutshell: 1. ", "What the Bleep Do We Know!? He has however just released his third book of pretty crystal pictures. While many of its interviewees and subjects are professional scientists in the fields of physics, chemistry, and biology, one of them has noted that the film quotes him out of context. Z. Knight and her pet dead guy Ramtha. A: Absolutely. The pity of it is that there are fascinating conversations going on in the science-and-religion sphere. But whenever one is dealing with highly speculative ideas that have no connection with experiment, theres a danger of becoming delusional and thinking that youre doing real science when youre not. The plot follows the fictional story of a photographer, using documentary-style interviews and computer-animated graphics, as she encounters emotional and existential obstacles in her life and begins to consider the idea that individual and group consciousness can influence the material world. Quantum physics tells us that reality isn't fixed subatomic particles only come into existence when they are observed, 2. Moreover, assume that they want your money. : Down the Rabbit Hole: Directed by William Arntz, Betsy Chasse, Mark Vicente. Your session to The Christian With Marlee Matlin, Elaine Hendrix, Barry Newman, Armin Shimerman. They don't go anywhere, Fred. Joe Dispenza Everyone is still talking about the movie What the Bleep Do We Know!? In the movie What the Bleep Do We Know?, physicists, biologists and the occasional chiropractor tell us how quantum physics and neuroscience support their views on consciousness. Film / What the #$*! Unfortunately hes written no papers after 1995, see, http://www.slac.stanford.edu/spires/find/hep/www?rawcmd=find+a+hagelin&FORMAT=WWW&SEQUENCE=. And wait-the human body is mostly water! Categories conflate, confound, connect", "Our power is in our ability to decide - Can you? Then we segue to a narrative starring Amanda (Marlee Maitlin), a wedding photographer who's bummed because her slimy husband cheated on her. 6. "What the Bleep Do We Know," a pseudoscientific docudrama that purports to link quantum mechanics and consciousness, would be a riot if people didn't take it so seriously. is a book of amazing science, and now the international bestselling book is available in paperback. He points out that Gallo et al anounced that AIDS is caused by HIV at a press conference, without there being a single paper published in a scientific journal substantiating this. But that doesn't mean that astrology is true. There appears to be no evidence to support this claim. In reality, science is completely incidental to the film's conclusions. 2. First, such claims rely on "hidden variables" susceptible to influence, he says. What the Bleep!? Directors William Arntz, Betsy Chasse Starring Marlee Matlin, Elaine Hendrix, John Ross Bowie Genres We'd like to be able to influence things just by thinking about them, we'd like to transport ourselves elsewhere without getting on an airplane. It's certainly not. [13] The American Chemical Society's review criticizes the film as a "pseudoscientific docudrama", saying "Among the more outlandish assertions are that people can travel backward in time, and that matter is actually thought. But that still doesn't mean that, at a global level, the weirdness of quantum mechanics is manifest. "[15], Bernie Hobbs, a science writer with ABC Science Online, explains why the film is incorrect about quantum physics and reality: "The observer effect of quantum physics isn't about people or reality. "Contrary to ordinary beliefs, quantum physics is very predictive," Dr. de Gouva continues. What the Bleep Do We Know draws heavily on the role of the observer in quantum physics. Dr Dispenza claims (correctly) in the movie that brain scans PET (Positron Emission Tomography) and Functional MRI (Magnetic Resonance Imaging) show that the same part of your brain lights up whether you're looking at something or just remembering it. "What the Bleep Do We Know?" is a trendy new movie that combines the worst elements of a snooze-worthy PBS documentary, a "change your mind, change your life" self-help book, and a Bugs. have described distinct assertions made as pseudoscience. Sol. Amit Goswami (PhD) in What the Bleep Do We Know?. Now comes the audio edition of the book based on the mind-boggling movie that grossed $11 million in the U.S. alone. [4] The visual-effects team, led by Evan Jacobs, worked closely with the other film-makers to create visual metaphors that would capture the essence of the film's technical subjects with attention to aesthetic detail. What the Bleep Do We Know!? Many people are dubious that Penrose's suggestions are reasonable, because the brain is not an isolated quantum-mechanical system. "The protagonist, Amanda, played by Academy Award-Winning actress Marlee Matlin, finds herself in a fantastic Alice in Wonderland experience when her daily, uninspired life literally begins to unravel, revealing the uncertain world of the quantum field hidden behind what we consider to be our normal, waking reality. You are free to comment as you wish. What the Bleep Do We Know? ft. house now used as offices), the Great Hall (a converted 15,375 sq. 7. and of course the big guy himself, Ramtha. We're bombarded by many things every second of the day, and a result, we're not specially prepared quantum mechanical systems, nor can we exert weird quantum powers over other objects. VISiT http://docsubtitles.blogspot.comsubscribe to watch full moviecheck also short trailer http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lJOrsql3KwU The year's most unexpected indie hit in American cinemas - a film about quantum physics - is about to open here. One other area where quantum mechanics works on a macroscopic scale is in superconductivity and superfluidity. Some credible researchers appear, including neurologist Andrew Newberg and physicist David Albert (Albert has since disassociated himself from the film, saying his views were misrepresented). The web makes all such things available today, so I can give you a Google link to a page about Maharishis unified field theory, http://www.worldpeaceendowment.org/invincibility/invincibility6.html. Those are two places where the quantum world leaks into the classical world. The quantum world is intriguing, but unless you're a particle physicist it's got very little to do with the world's reality. 1. But when the ramblings about quantum physics start merging with fridge magnet philosophy, it's time for a little reality checking. The movie contains interviews from such leaders in their fields as: Candace. Unfortunately, it also completely misunderstands it. The debate here is that we'll be able to use quantum mechanics to break codes, in particular to determine the big prime numbers that are at the basis of the security of your credit cards and your bank cards. Some ideas discussed in the film are: In the narrative segments of the film, Marlee Matlin portrays Amanda, a photographer who plays the role of everywoman as she experiences her life from startlingly new and different perspectives. Isnt Langs viewpoint in line with the sort of criticism that string theory receives at this web site? . Prominent if you go by citations that is. Krauss worries that a lot of people can be fooled by appeals to the admittedly weird world of quantum physics a world in which particles are said to take every possible path from point A to point B, in which the position and velocity of particles are necessarily cloaked in uncertainty, in which the mere act of observation changes the thing being observed. you are agreeing to our, One month free trial to theMonitorDaily, Staff writer of The Christian Science Monitor, Performance of quantum computer no better than ordinary PC, say analysts, 'Spooky' physics: How quantum entanglement could link wormholes, Quantum 'teleportation' distance record broken. For many years in the early-mid-eighties, the Maharishi was pushing N=8 supergravity as the unified field theory, I remember a colorful poster explaining how it agreed exactly with his philosophy that many people posted on their walls. The main weird thing about them was they were printed on pink paper instead of white. I guess it's a sign that quantum physics is entering the mainstream A: Well, yeah, the point is that there have been these new-age desires for lots of things to make the world better: crystals, energy vortices.